Islamic Xmas Song

Sound the Alarm Now

Newscast from the future

It is January, 2009 and President B. Hussein Obama has been sworn in as president of the United States. For days Islamic extremists have been dancing in the streets in Arab capitals. Partial birth abortion is cleared for federal funding and same sex marriage is declared legal in every state. Meanwhile a new FCC rule takes all conservative and Christian talk shows off the air. Watch the newscast now at www.obamanews2009.com and learn what the reality of a B. Hussein Obama presidency would be.

Election 911


crédito: SoundTheAlarmNow

Joe, the plumber

Crédito da imagem aqui




Barack HUSSEIN Obama And The DNC Are Committing Fraud Against The American People


Acesse também:
www.obamacrimes.com




Clique abaixo para saber mais sobre B. Hussein!

SARAH ROCKS!

O título acima, do qual compartilho entusiasmada, é do post de Michelle Malkin sobre o debate entre Sarah Palin e a raposa Joe Biden (ou rato do Senado norte-americano?).

O trecho final do post de Michelle Malkin resume o debate que eu vi (na FOX, é claro!):

"Pause to reflect on this: She matched — and trumped several times — a man who has spent his entire adult life on the political stage, run for president twice, and as he mentioned several times, chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Sarah Palin looked presidential.

Joe Biden looked tired.

Sarah made history.

Biden is history."

Quem é o pitbull?

Sarah Palin tem sido atacada indiscriminada e injustamente pela mídia esquerdopata daqui e de lá (com exceções, é claro).


Ao mesmo tempo, prepararam para Palin outra armadilha suja (que aliás, é o que caracteriza os esquerdinhas de toda ordem): o debate de amanhã entre Sarah Palin e Biden, terá a "moderação" de Gwen Ifill que é uma 'afrodescendente democrata' pró B. HUSSEIN autora do livro "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama", que além de ser LIXO puro, comprova o que afirmo aqui.


Abaixo reproduzo o post e o artigo de Michelle Malkin a respeito do assunto:



(Aí está a tal "isenta" Gwen Ifill com B. HUSSEIN)*


"My first syndicated column of the week, filed this afternoon, shines light on PBS anchor Gwen Ifill, who will moderate Thursday’s only vice presidential debate. Try as she might to deflect questions about her impartiality, her biases — and her conflict of interest — are clear. But don’t you dare breathe a word about any of this. You know what will happen if you do…

RACIST!


Sidenote: TVNewser reports that Ifill has broken her ankle, but she’s still going to do the debate. But will she disclose her conflict of interest? Inquiring minds want to know.


Ask the Commission on Presidential Debates if she will acknowledge her conflict of interest: USA 202-872-1020.


And here’s the e-mail address of Janet H. Brown, Executive Director of the Debates Commission: jb@debates.org


Hopefully, their email system works better than the House.


Tons of readers recommend that Sarah Palin open her debate remarks by congratulating Ifill on her book and asking her to tell everyone the title.

***

A debate “moderator” in the tank for Obama

By Michelle Malkin • September 30, 2008 10:13 PM

Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2008


My dictionary defines “moderator” as “the nonpartisan presiding officer of a town meeting.” On Thursday, PBS anchor Gwen Ifill will serve as moderator for the first and only vice presidential debate. The stakes are high. The Commission on Presidential Debates, with the assent of the two campaigns, decided not to impose any guidelines on her duties or questions.


But there is nothing “moderate” about where Ifill stands on Barack Obama. She’s so far in the tank for the Democrat presidential candidate, her oxygen delivery line is running out.


In an imaginary world where liberal journalists are held to the same standards as everyone else, Ifill would be required to make a full disclosure at the start of the debate. She would be required to turn to the cameras and tell the national audience that she has a book coming out on January 20, 2009 – a date that just happens to coincide with the inauguration of the next president of the United States.


The title of Ifill’s book? "Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.” Nonpartisan my foot.


Ifill’s publisher, Random House , is already busy hyping the book with YouTube clips of Ifill heaping praise on her subjects, including Obama and Obama-endorsing Mass. Governor Deval Patrick. The official promo for the book gushes:


“In The Breakthrough, veteran journalist Gwen Ifill surveys the American political landscape, shedding new light on the impact of Barack Obama’s stunning presidential campaign and introducing the emerging young African American politicians forging a bold new path to political power…Drawing on interviews with power brokers like Senator Obama, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, Vernon Jordan, the Reverend Jesse Jackson, and many others, as well as her own razor-sharp observations and analysis of such issues as generational conflict and the ‘black enough’ conundrum, Ifill shows why this is a pivotal moment in American history.”


Ifill and her publisher are banking on an Obama/Biden win to buoy her book sales. The moderator expected to treat both sides fairly has grandiosely declared this the “Age of Obama.” Can you imagine a right-leaning journalist writing a book about the “stunning” McCain campaign and its “bold” path to reform timed for release on Inauguration Day – and then expecting a slot as a moderator for the nation’s sole vice presidential debate?


Yeah, I just registered 6.4 on the Snicker Richter Scale, too.



Despite the protestations of her colleagues that she will be fair, Ifill has appeared on numerous radio and TV talk shows over the past several months to cash in on her access to the Obama campaign. She recently penned a fawning cover story on the Obamas for Essence magazine that earned much buzz. The title? “The Obamas: Portrait of an American Family.” A sample of Ifill’s hard-hitting investigative journalism, illustrated with Kennedyesque photos of the Obamas and children posing at home on the backporch and by the piano:


“Barack Obama is sitting in the back of his rented luxury campaign bus with its granite counters and two flat-screen TVs. The Illinois senator’s arms are wrapped around his wife, Michelle, whom he doesn’t get to see much these days. At this very moment he is, of all things, singing.”


During the Democratic National Convention, Ifill offered her neutral analysis before Michelle Obama’s speech on NBC News: “A lot of people have never seen anything that looks like a Michelle Obama before. She’s educated, she’s beautiful, she’s tall, she tells you what she thinks and they hope that she can tell a story about Barack Obama and about herself…”


During the Republican National Convention, the PBS ombudsman fielded numerous complaints about Ifill’s coverage of Sarah Palin’s speech. Wrote Brian Meyers of Granby, Ct.:


“I was appalled by Gwen Ifill’s commentary directly following Gov. Sarah Palin’s speech. Her attitude was dismissive and the look on her face was one of disgust. Clearly, she was agitated by what most critics view as a well-delivered speech. It is quite obvious that Ms. Ifill supports Obama as she struggled to say anything redemptive about Gov. Palin’s performance. I am disappointed in Ms. Ifill’s complete disregard for journalistic objectivity.”


Like Obama, Ifill, who is black, is quick to play the race card at the first sign of criticism. In an interview with the Washington Post a few weeks ago, she carped: “[N]o one’s ever assumed a white reporter can’t cover a white candidate.”


It’s not the color of your skin, sweetie. It’s the color of your politics. Perhaps Ifill will be able to conceal it this week. But if the “stunning” “Breakthrough” she’s rooting for comes to pass on January 20, 2009, nobody will be fooled.


***


Here’s the video clip of Ifill’s reaction to Palin’s RNC speech:



***

As Instapundit’s newsroom correspondent put it: “The fix is in, and it’s working.”


Bob Unruh adds:


"Ifill declined to return a WND telephone message asking for a comment about her book project and whether its success would be expected should Obama lose. But she has faced criticism previously for not treating candidates of both major parties the same.

During a vice-presidential candidate debate she moderated in 2004 – when Democrat John Edwards attacked Republican Dick Cheney’s former employer, Halliburton – the vice president said, “I can respond, Gwen, but it’s going to take more than 30 seconds.”

“Well, that’s all you’ve got,” she told Cheney.

Ifill told the Associated Press Democrats were delighted with her answer, because they “thought I was being snippy to Cheney.” She explained that wasn’t her intent."


Uh-huh."


Aí vai um 'close' do verdadeiro pitbull:





* comentário meu
*************************************************



DESTAQUE:

No site de Heitor de Paola a mais pura expressão da verdade:

DAS ELEIÇÕES, LÁ E CÁ



"APROXIMAM-SE AS ELEIÇÕES LÁ (EUA) E CÁ (BRASIL). ME PERGUNTAM PORQUE NÃO COMENTO AS DE CÁ. A RAZÃO É SIMPLES: EM REGIME DE PARTIDO ÚNICO NADA HÁ A COMENTAR! EXPLICO: CÁ, AS SIGLAS PARTIDÁRIAS NÃO EXPRESSAM IDEOLOGIAS NEM MESMO DIFERENÇAS POLÍTICAS MAS MERA ARRUMAÇÃO ALEATÓRIA DE MASSINHAS NUM PRATO DE SOPA DE LETRINHAS."

YES to Sarah Palin, NO to B. HUSSEIN

Sarah Smile




Song Lloyd Marcus.

Mais curiosidades obâmicas

Por Olavo de Carvalho
Jornal do Brasil, 25 de setembro de 2008



A coluna de Maureen Dowd citada no artigo anterior era falsa. O engraçadinho que a enviou a mim sabia disso, pois não pode tê-la colhido nas páginas do New York Times, onde ela nunca esteve.


Em todo caso, não a mencionei como prova de nada, apenas como ilustração, curiosa mas dispensável, de algo que já estava bem provado por mil e um outros meios: que, se a candidatura de Barack Obama, como qualquer outra, é subsidiada por uma multiplicidade de fontes, o mesmo não se pode dizer da sua carreira total, criada e financiada desde o início por pessoas ligadas a organizações pró-terroristas e/ou ao banditismo puro e simples. Quem formou sua mentalidade foram os doutrinadores extremistas Frank Marshall Davis e Jeremiah Wright, quem o lançou na política foi o terrorista William Ayers (do grupo “Homem do Tempo”), quem pagou seus estudos em Harvard foi um mentor dos “Panteras Negras”, quem mais coletou dinheiro para ele nas eleições ao Senado foi um vigarista sírio condenado por dezesseis crimes. Que essa candidatura desperte o entusiasmo de todos os grupos pró-terroristas e partidos comunistas do mundo não prova uma “conspiração” em sentido estrito – tecnicamente, nenhum movimento histórico de amplitude mundial pode ser chamado uma “conspiração” –, mas também não pode ser uma inocente coincidência ex post facto. Obama nasceu desse meio, alimentou-se dele, e o aplauso que daí recebe é apenas o reforço final necessário para que a ambição longamente acalentada de destruir os EUA desde dentro (e desde cima) deixe de ser apenas um sonho de mentes malignas e se torne uma temível realidade.



Ahmadinejad tem razão: a eleição de Obama, se acontecer, será o sinal verde para a conquista da América pelo Islam revolucionário e seus parceiros comunistas, como a sedução da alma do príncipe Charles por um guru muçulmano, mais de vinte anos atrás, – ignorada pela mídia até hoje – foi o início da conquista da Inglaterra. Esta geração dificilmente passará sem que o mundo veja a autodissolução da Igreja anglicana e sua transformação em entreposto do islamismo. Mas talvez passe sem que os EUA – e portanto Israel – consumem sua rendição sacrificial ante o altar de seus inimigos. A presente eleição americana não é o último lance dessa disputa, mas é certamente um dos mais decisivos.



Ainda não sei ao certo como a crise econômica sustada pela ação rápida da Presidência americana se insere nesse quadro, mas sei que ela foi criada pelos democratas, que agora escondem suas culpas, como sempre, por trás de acusações ao governo e extraem proveito eleitoral de seus próprios crimes ignorados pela população. Fannie Mae e Freddie Mac já estavam encrencados em 2005 e o Senado discutia uma lei para impedir o desastre. A lei foi bloqueada pelos senadores Hillary Clinton, Christopher Dodd e – vejam só – Barack Obama, que em seguida receberam vultosas contribuições de campanha de Fannie e Freddie. (Leiam a história em http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0, e fiquem tranqüilos: ninguém me enviou a matéria por e-mail, eu mesmo a li na página da Bloomberg.)



Seria ingênuo esperar de esquerdistas uma conduta mais decente. Nas últimas semanas, eles apelaram aos expedientes mais extremos para esculhambar a candidatura McCain: montaram grupos terroristas armados de coquetéis Molotov para desmantelar a convenção republicana (cem incendiários foram presos na véspera, mas os remanescentes ainda fizeram um belo estrago), espalharam fofocas escabrosas sobre a família Palin (incluindo insinuações de incesto), armaram um escândalo nacional em torno da demissão de um policial no Alasca, como se fosse um novo Watergate, e invadiram os e-mails de Sarah Palin, publicando tudo (droga!, não havia nada de comprometedor). E a Folha de S. Paulo, com a cara mais bisonha do universo, informa a seus queridos leitores que Obama está escandalizado com o baixo nível dos ataques vindos da campanha McCain...